Bratcher v. United States
Opinion
In the United States Court of Federal Claims )
MICHAEL A. and TINA C. BRATCHER, )
et al., )
)
Plaintiffs, ) No. 15-986L ) (Filed: June 18, 2018)
v. )
)
THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, )
)
Defendant. )
)
ORDER
Plaintiffs have advised the Court that the parties have reached a settlement regarding interest damages. ECF No. 125. Accordingly, pursuant to Rule 58, the Clerk is directed to enter judgment in favor of Plaintiffs as set forth in the table below.
Claim Total Interest Per Diem Interest Owner
No. through 2/24/18 After 2/24/18
1a William Payne $1,996.14 $1.03 1b William Payne $2,063.13 $1.06 2 Kenneth and Henryetta Payne $3,772.97 $1.94 3a, 3b David and Malia Emerson $156.25 $0.08 4 Drew Emerson $817.90 $0.42 12 King Revocable Trust $1,592.93 $0.82 13 Stephenson Revocable Trust $366.24 $0.19 14a James Scott $987.20 $0.51 14b James Scott $1,087.22 $0.56
15 Flint and Connie Neece $3,305.77 $1.70 16 Lori Locke $2,196.19 $1.13 17 David and Doreen Hasenbeck $1,037.21 $0.53 18 Simnitt Family Trust $674.08 $0.35
IT IS SO ORDERED.
s/ Elaine D. Kaplan
ELAINE D. KAPLAN
Judge
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Bratcher v. United States (Bratcher v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.