Braswell v. State

Alabama Court of Appeals

Braswell v. State

199 So. 739, 29 Ala. App. 604, 1941 Ala. App. LEXIS 2

CourtAlabama Court of Appeals

DecidedJanuary 14, 1941

Docket4 Div. 603.

StatusPublished

This text of 199 So. 739 (Braswell v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Alabama Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Braswell v. State, 199 So. 739, 29 Ala. App. 604, 1941 Ala. App. LEXIS 2 (Ala. Ct. App. 1941).

Pincite

Opinion

*605 SIMPSON, Judge.

The appeal is from a judgment of conviction of buying, receiving, concealing or aiding in concealing stolen property, etc. Code 1923, Section 4912. There is no bill of exceptions, the appeal being predicated upon the record proper alone. The sole insistence of error' is the refusal of the trial court to give for the defendant a certain written charge, duly requested. Action of the court in refusing such charge is not reviewable without a bill of exceptions. Hewett v. State, 231 Ala. 524, 165 So. 772; Abrams v. State, 236 Ala. 41, 180 So. 774; Brooks v. State, Ala.App., 193 So. 325 ; 1 Griffin v. State, 28 Ala.App. 581, 190 So. 289; Davidson v. State, 26 Ala.App. 164, 155 So. 315; 7 Alabama Digest, Criminal Law, <®=:>1090 (14).

This court, therefore,' being without authority to consider said insistence and the record proper being regular in all respects, the judgment must be affirmed.

Affirmed.

1

Ante, p. 142.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

*605 SIMPSON, Judge.

The appeal is from a judgment of conviction of buying, receiving, concealing or aiding in concealing stolen property, etc. Code 1923, Section 4912. There is no bill of exceptions, the appeal being predicated upon the record proper alone. The sole insistence of error' is the refusal of the trial court to give for the defendant a certain written charge, duly requested. Action of the court in refusing such charge is not reviewable without a bill of exceptions. Hewett v. State, 231 Ala. 524, 165 So. 772; Abrams v. State, 236 Ala. 41, 180 So. 774; Brooks v. State, Ala.App., 193 So. 325 ; 1 Griffin v. State, 28 Ala.App. 581, 190 So. 289; Davidson v. State, 26 Ala.App. 164, 155 So. 315; 7 Alabama Digest, Criminal Law, <®=:>1090 (14).

This court, therefore,' being without authority to consider said insistence and the record proper being regular in all respects, the judgment must be affirmed.

Affirmed.

1

Ante, p. 142.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

199 So. 739, 29 Ala. App. 604, 1941 Ala. App. LEXIS 2, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/braswell-v-state-alactapp-1941.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack