Braswell v. Macon Savings Bank
Opinion
There being in the bill of exceptions no assignment of error upon any final judgment, but merely an exception to a judgment sustaining a demurrer to the defendant’s answer, and striking the answer, no question is presented which this court has jurisdiction to decide, and the motion of the defendant in error to dismiss the bill of exceptions must be sustained. Enecks v. International Harvester Co., 17 Ga. App. 548 (87 S. E. 811); Walker v. Howland, 17 Ga. App. 548 (3) (87 S. E. 813); Turner v. Strauss-Epstein Co., 20 Ga. App. 735 (93 S. E. 234); Tinsley v. Gullett Gin Co., 21 Ga. App. 512 (94 S. E. 892); Johnson v. Battle, 120 Ga. 649 (2) (48 S. E. 128); Samson Tractor Co. v. Furlong, 28 Ga. App. 659 (112 S. E. 903).
Writ of error dismissed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
117 S.E. 664 (Braswell v. Macon Savings Bank) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.