Braswell v. Hurley

148 S.W. 32, 149 Ky. 205, 1912 Ky. LEXIS 601
CourtCourt of Appeals of Kentucky
DecidedJune 21, 1912
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 148 S.W. 32 (Braswell v. Hurley) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Kentucky primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Braswell v. Hurley, 148 S.W. 32, 149 Ky. 205, 1912 Ky. LEXIS 601 (Ky. Ct. App. 1912).

Opinion

Opinion of the Court by

Chief Justice Hobson

Affirming,

[206]*206This appeal is prosecuted on an incomplete transcript of the record. By rule 27 of the court, a partial transcript may be brought up on a schedule filed in the Clerk’s office as prescribed by section 737 of the Code of practice. But no schedule was filed in this case and the clerk merely certifies that the transcript contains a true copy of the petition, the demurrer thereto and the order sustaining it. The presumption is that the circuit court ruled correctly. We cannot know from this transcript what other orders the circuit court made in the action or what other pleadings were filed in it. The presumption that the circuit court ruled correctly is not overcome when a partial transcript is filed, unless it is so made out that under the rule it must be treated as a complete transcript. See Civil Code, section 737, subsection 12.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Prewitt v. Wilborn
212 S.W. 442 (Court of Appeals of Kentucky, 1919)
Trosper Coal Co. v. R. C. Tway Mining Co.
209 S.W. 58 (Court of Appeals of Kentucky, 1919)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
148 S.W. 32, 149 Ky. 205, 1912 Ky. LEXIS 601, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/braswell-v-hurley-kyctapp-1912.