Braswell v. Birch Properties, Inc.

42 A.D.2d 1028, 348 N.Y.S.2d 432, 1973 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3284
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedOctober 26, 1973
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 42 A.D.2d 1028 (Braswell v. Birch Properties, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Braswell v. Birch Properties, Inc., 42 A.D.2d 1028, 348 N.Y.S.2d 432, 1973 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3284 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1973).

Opinion

Order unanimously modified in accordance with Memorandum and as so modified affirmed, without costs. Memorandum: Plaintiff appeals from an order at Special Term which granted defendant’s motion for an oral examination of one Ada Wilson, a witness, who was shown to have been present in decedent’s premises at the time of his death which was allegedly caused by defendant’s negligence in permitting gas fumes to escape therein. Adequate special circumstances were shown for disclosure by Wilson to satisfy the requirements of CPLR 3101 (subd. [a], par. [4]) but she was not shown to be under defendant’s control and subject to examination under CPLR 3101 (subd. [a], par. [1]). The provision of the order which directed plaintiff to assist and co-operate in locating and producing Wilson at the examination before trial is not authorized and the third ordering paragraph which so provides should be stricken (Gallup V. Dybas, 75 Misc 2d 179). A provision should be added to the order determining that there are adequate special circumstances to require disclosure by Ada Wilson and that plaintiff should disclose her whereabouts to defendant (see Zellman V. Metropolitan Transp. Auth., 40 A D 2d 248; Wolken v. Howell Co., 41 A D 2d 545; Sanfilipo v. Baptist Temple, 52 Misc 2d 767), so that it might, if so advised, subpoena her for the purpose of taking her testimony by deposition (CPLR 3106). (Appeal from order of Erie Special Term granting motion for examination before trial in wrongful death action.) Present — Goldman, P. J., Del Vecchio, Witmer, Cardamone and Henry, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Taibbi v. New York State Liquor Authority
48 A.D.2d 568 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1975)
Rupert v. Sellers
48 A.D.2d 265 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1975)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
42 A.D.2d 1028, 348 N.Y.S.2d 432, 1973 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3284, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/braswell-v-birch-properties-inc-nyappdiv-1973.