Brasted v. Sutton

New Jersey Court of Chancery

Brasted v. Sutton

30 N.J. Eq. 462

DecidedFebruary 15, 1879

StatusPublished

This text of 30 N.J. Eq. 462 (Brasted v. Sutton) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New Jersey Court of Chancery primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Brasted v. Sutton, 30 N.J. Eq. 462 (N.J. Ct. App. 1879).

Pincite

Opinion

The Chancellor.

This application is made in aid of proceedings at law—an action of ejectment brought by the complainant on his mortgage for the recovery of possession of the mortgaged premises. The mortgagor is insolvent; the property is an, insufficient security; the mortgagor has moved away from the premises and given possession to a person who is to occupy them for his own use without payment of rent and without accounting for the use thereof; and the mortgagor has committed waste and threatened to commit more.

A receiver will be appointed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

The Chancellor.

This application is made in aid of proceedings at law—an action of ejectment brought by the complainant on his mortgage for the recovery of possession of the mortgaged premises. The mortgagor is insolvent; the property is an, insufficient security; the mortgagor has moved away from the premises and given possession to a person who is to occupy them for his own use without payment of rent and without accounting for the use thereof; and the mortgagor has committed waste and threatened to commit more.

A receiver will be appointed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

30 N.J. Eq. 462, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/brasted-v-sutton-njch-1879.