Brast v. Kanawha Oil Co.
This text of 33 S.E. 302 (Brast v. Kanawha Oil Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering West Virginia Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
M. A. Brast moves the Court to vacate an order granting an appeal from an ex farte order of the judge of the circuit court of Wetzel County granting an injunction. Such an order is not appealable.. It is not an adjudication between parties. One side has not been heard, and until he moves the court that granted the injunction to correct it, he has no right of appeal. Appeals are to correct errors committed after hearing, and not to review mere preliminary orders, madie in the absence of one of the litigants. Such orders are. still in the breast of the court until finally heard and determined. The party affected thereby has [614]*614an easy remedy by motion, and an appeal will not lie until sucb motion proves ineffectual. 2 Enc. Pl. & Prac. 96; Aldinger v. Pugh, 57 Hun, 181, 10 N. Y. Supp. 684; Gibson v. Martin, 8 Paige, 481; Skidmore v. Davis, 10 Paige, 816; In re Johnson’s Estate, 27 Hun, 538; In re Dunn (Sup.) 14 N. Y. Supp. 14; State v. District Court First Judicial Dist. 52 Minn. 283, (53 N. W. 1157.) Therefore the appeal in this case is dismissed, as improvidently awarded.
Dismissed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
33 S.E. 302, 46 W. Va. 613, 1899 W. Va. LEXIS 88, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/brast-v-kanawha-oil-co-wva-1899.