Brassell v. Laban
This text of 722 N.W.2d 893 (Brassell v. Laban) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Troy Orlando BRASSELL, Plaintiff-Appellee and Cross-Appellant,
v.
Officer Darrin LABAN, Defendant-Appellant and Cross-Appellee, and
City of Taylor and Officer Ted Michowski, Defendants.
Supreme Court of Michigan.
On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the March 28, 2006 judgment of the Court of Appeals and the application for leave to appeal as cross-appellant are considered, and they are DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
CORRIGAN, J., would reverse for the reasons stated in the Court of Appeals partial dissenting opinion.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
722 N.W.2d 893, 477 Mich. 924, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/brassell-v-laban-mich-2006.