Brassard v. Stoner

149 N.E. 647, 83 Ind. App. 737, 1925 Ind. App. LEXIS 147
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Brassard v. Stoner. Read the opinion of the Court — 83 Ind. App. 655
Indiana Court of Appeals·Decided November 25, 1925·No. No. 12,089.·Published

Opinion

Remy, C. J.

Proceeding supplementary to execution by appellant against appellees; from a judgment for appellees, this *738 appeal is prosecuted. The only question for consideration by this court is the sufficiency of the evidence. There is competent evidence to sustain the decision.

After the trial court had overruled the motion for a new trial in this cause, at a, subsequent term of court, and more than thirty days after the judgment had been rendered, appellant instituted an independent proceeding for new trial, which resulted in a judgment for appellees. From that judgment there was an appeal to this court. See, Brassard v. Stoner (1925), ante 655, 149 N. E. 646.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Brassard v. Stoner, 149 N.E. 647, 83 Ind. App. 737, 1925 Ind. App. LEXIS 147 (Ind. Ct. App. 1925).

149 N.E. 647 (Brassard v. Stoner) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Brassard v. Stoner
149 N.E. 646 (Indiana Court of Appeals, 1925)