Brass v. Davis

Missouri Court of Appeals

Brass v. Davis

232 S.W.3d 666, 2007 Mo. App. LEXIS 1247, 2007 WL 2593769

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided September 11, 2007·No. ED 89161·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIUM.

John and Margaret Brass and Fred and Margaret Yorwerk (Appellants) appeal from the trial court’s denial of declaratory judgment and an injunction to prohibit developers Jerry and Mary Ann Davis (Respondents) from dividing a plot of land in the Maryridge subdivision in St. Charles County. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal, and no error of law appears. The judgment of the trial court is affirmed. No prece-dential or jurisprudential purpose would be served by an opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law. However, a memorandum has been provided to the parties for their use only, setting forth the reasons for this order. We affirm pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIUM.

John and Margaret Brass and Fred and Margaret Yorwerk (Appellants) appeal from the trial court’s denial of declaratory judgment and an injunction to prohibit developers Jerry and Mary Ann Davis (Respondents) from dividing a plot of land in the Maryridge subdivision in St. Charles County. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal, and no error of law appears. The judgment of the trial court is affirmed. No prece-dential or jurisprudential purpose would be served by an opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law. However, a memorandum has been provided to the parties for their use only, setting forth the reasons for this order. We affirm pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Brass v. Davis, 232 S.W.3d 666, 2007 Mo. App. LEXIS 1247, 2007 WL 2593769 (Mo. Ct. App. 2007).

Pincite

232 S.W.3d 666 (Brass v. Davis) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.