Brass v. City of New York

New York Court of Appeals

Brass v. City of New York

21 N.E.2d 209, 280 N.Y. 707, 1939 N.Y. LEXIS 1523

New York Court of Appeals·Decided April 21, 1939·Published

Opinion

Judgment of the Appellate Division reversed and judgment of the Trial Term affirmed, with costs in this court and in the Appellate Division, on the ground that the questions of defendant’s negligence, proximate cause and freedom from contributory negligence on the part of Becky Brass were questions of fact for the jury, and there was evidence to sustain the verdicts for the plaintiffs. (Williams v. City of New York, 214 N. Y. 259.) No opinion.

Concur: Crane, Ch. J., Lehman, O’Brien, Hubbs, Loughran, Finch and Rippey, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Judgment of the Appellate Division reversed and judgment of the Trial Term affirmed, with costs in this court and in the Appellate Division, on the ground that the questions of defendant’s negligence, proximate cause and freedom from contributory negligence on the part of Becky Brass were questions of fact for the jury, and there was evidence to sustain the verdicts for the plaintiffs. (Williams v. City of New York, 214 N. Y. 259.) No opinion.

Concur: Crane, Ch. J., Lehman, O’Brien, Hubbs, Loughran, Finch and Rippey, JJ.

Brass v. City of New York, 21 N.E.2d 209, 280 N.Y. 707, 1939 N.Y. LEXIS 1523 (N.Y. 1939).

Pincite

21 N.E.2d 209 (Brass v. City of New York) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related