Brass v. City of New York
This text of 21 N.E.2d 209 (Brass v. City of New York) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Judgment of the Appellate Division reversed and judgment of the Trial Term affirmed, with costs in this court and in the Appellate Division, on the ground that the questions of defendant’s negligence, proximate cause and freedom from contributory negligence on the part of Becky Brass were questions of fact for the jury, and there was evidence to sustain the verdicts for the plaintiffs. (Williams v. City of New York, 214 N. Y. 259.) No opinion.
Concur: Crane, Ch. J., Lehman, O’Brien, Hubbs, Loughran, Finch and Rippey, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
21 N.E.2d 209, 280 N.Y. 707, 1939 N.Y. LEXIS 1523, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/brass-v-city-of-new-york-ny-1939.