Brasington v. Brasington
This text of 46 F. App'x 198 (Brasington v. Brasington) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Boyce Allen Brasington appeals from the district court’s order affirming the bankruptcy court’s order determining that a marital debt was not dischargeable in his bankruptcy proceeding. Our review of the record and the opinions below discloses no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Brasington v. Shapiro, 274 B.R. 159 (D.Md.2002). The Appellees’ motions for summary affirmanee/dismissal, for sanctions, and to impose an appeal bond are hereby denied. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
46 F. App'x 198, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/brasington-v-brasington-ca4-2002.