Brasington v. Brasington

46 F. App'x 198
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided September 23, 2002·No. 02-1394·Unpublished

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Boyce Allen Brasington appeals from the district court’s order affirming the bankruptcy court’s order determining that a marital debt was not dischargeable in his bankruptcy proceeding. Our review of the record and the opinions below discloses no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Brasington v. Shapiro, 274 B.R. 159 (D.Md.2002). The Appellees’ motions for summary affirmanee/dismissal, for sanctions, and to impose an appeal bond are hereby denied. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Brasington v. Brasington, 46 F. App'x 198 (4th Cir. 2002).

46 F. App'x 198 (Brasington v. Brasington) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Brasington v. Brasington
274 B.R. 159 (D. Maryland, 2002)