Brasher v. State
160 So. 3d 107, 2015 Fla. App. LEXIS 3884, 2015 WL 1213502
Opinion
Affirmed without prejudice to appellant filing a sworn and legally sufficient motion under Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.801. See Mathis v. State, 139 So.3d 988 (Fla. 4th DCA 2014); Casteel v. State, 141 So.3d 624 (Fla. 4th DCA 2014). Thereafter, appellant can revisit the legality of his sentence. See, e.g., McLeod v. State, 58 So.3d 931 (Fla. 5th DCA 2011); Lawson v. State, 46 So.3d 1189, 1190 (Fla. 2d DCA 2010).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Brasher v. State, 160 So. 3d 107, 2015 Fla. App. LEXIS 3884, 2015 WL 1213502 (Fla. Ct. App. 2015).
160 So. 3d 107 (Brasher v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Mathis v. State
139 So. 3d 988 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2014)
Casteel v. State
141 So. 3d 624 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2014)
Lawson v. State
46 So. 3d 1189 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2010)
McLeod v. State
58 So. 3d 931 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2011)