Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Brasher v. State

Brasher v. State

160 So. 3d 107, 2015 Fla. App. LEXIS 3884, 2015 WL 1213502
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedMarch 18, 2015
DocketNos. 4D14-3031, 4D14-4137
StatusPublished

This text of 160 So. 3d 107 (Brasher v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Brasher v. State, 160 So. 3d 107, 2015 Fla. App. LEXIS 3884, 2015 WL 1213502 (Fla. Ct. App. 2015).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed without prejudice to appellant filing a sworn and legally sufficient motion under Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.801. See Mathis v. State, 139 So.3d 988 (Fla. 4th DCA 2014); Casteel v. State, 141 So.3d 624 (Fla. 4th DCA 2014). Thereafter, appellant can revisit the legality of his sentence. See, e.g., McLeod v. State, 58 So.3d 931 (Fla. 5th DCA 2011); Lawson v. State, 46 So.3d 1189, 1190 (Fla. 2d DCA 2010).

WARNER, TAYLOR and MAY, JJ, concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Mathis v. State
139 So. 3d 988 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2014)
Casteel v. State
141 So. 3d 624 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2014)
Lawson v. State
46 So. 3d 1189 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2010)
McLeod v. State
58 So. 3d 931 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2011)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
160 So. 3d 107, 2015 Fla. App. LEXIS 3884, 2015 WL 1213502, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/brasher-v-state-fladistctapp-2015.