Home/The Superior Court of New York City/Brash v. Wielarsky

Brash v. Wielarsky

36 How. Pr. 254
CourtThe Superior Court of New York City
DecidedDecember 4, 1868
StatusPublished

This text of 36 How. Pr. 254 (Brash v. Wielarsky) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering The Superior Court of New York City primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Brash v. Wielarsky, 36 How. Pr. 254 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1868).

Opinion

Jones, J.

The non-filing of the affidavit does not affect the validity of the warrant or of the proceedings thereunder. Motion denied with $10 costs, without prejudice, to renew-on affidavits upon payment of said $10 costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
36 How. Pr. 254, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/brash-v-wielarsky-nysuperctnyc-1868.