Brash v. Wielarsky

36 How. Pr. 253, 1868 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 156
The Superior Court of New York City·Decided December 14, 1868·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Order to show cause.

On the attachment issued in this action, a copy of which is hereto annexed, and on the annexed certificate of the clerk of the city and county of New York, and on the annexed certified copy affidavit filed in this action, November 21st, 1868, let the plaintiff show cause before me at special term, at chambers of this court, at the city hall New York city, on December 5th, 1868, at 11 a. m., or as’ soon thereafter as counsel can be heard, why the attachment in this action should not be set aside for irregularity in that the affidavit, upon which the same was granted, was not filed in the office of the clerk of New York county, pursuant to section 229 of the Code of Procedure. And also on the ground that the affidavit for attachment upon which the same was granted, filed in the clerk’s office of this court does not show facts sufficient to establish that the defendant was about to fraudulently remove and dispose of his property with intent to cheat or defraud his creditors or any other ground for an-attachment, and why such other or further relief should not be granted to the defendant as to the court shall seem proper, besides the costs of this motion ; and in the meantime and until the hearing and determination of this motion, let the plaintiff be stayed from entering judgment in this action, and from further proceedings under the attachment.

December 4, 1868.

JOHN H. McCUNN,

Justice.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Brash v. Wielarsky, 36 How. Pr. 253, 1868 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 156 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1868).

36 How. Pr. 253 (Brash v. Wielarsky) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Woodward v. Stearns
10 Abb. Pr. 395 (New York Court of Common Pleas, 1871)