Brasfield v. State of Ark.

104 F.3d 363, 1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 37692, 1996 WL 721134
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
DecidedDecember 17, 1996
Docket96-2220
StatusUnpublished

This text of 104 F.3d 363 (Brasfield v. State of Ark.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Brasfield v. State of Ark., 104 F.3d 363, 1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 37692, 1996 WL 721134 (8th Cir. 1996).

Opinion

104 F.3d 363

NOTICE: Eighth Circuit Rule 28A(k) governs citation of unpublished opinions and provides that they are not precedent and generally should not be cited unless relevant to establishing the doctrines of res judicata, collateral estoppel, the law of the case, or if the opinion has persuasive value on a material issue and no published opinion would serve as well.
Joe BRASFIELD, Sr., Appellant,
v.
STATE OF ARKANSAS; Don Smith, Sheriff; Edgar Stain,
Deputy; Larry Allen, Deputy; Steve Young, Deputy; Gibbs
Ferguson; Arkansas State Plant Board; Gerald King,
Director of the State Plant Board; Charles Armstrong;
Windy Spakes; Dan Wicker; David Stubbs; E.N. Hill; Chip
Hill; Bullocks Flying Service, also known as Southern Air;
Blake Haynes; Isaiah Jackson; Rosemary Jackson; Joe
James; Eddie Lee Phillips, Appellees.

No. 96-2220.

United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit.

Submitted Dec. 6, 1996.
Filed Dec. 17, 1996.

Before BOWMAN, MAGILL, and LOKEN, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

Joe Brasfield, Sr., appeals the district court's1 dismissal of his suit filed under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 and the Clean Air Act, 42 U.S.C. §§ 7402-7671q, for failure to state a claim. We have reviewed the district court record, the parties' briefs, and the additional pleadings filed by Brasfield, and conclude that the district court's judgment is correct, as Brasfield's allegations are insufficient as a matter of law to provide relief. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

Accordingly, we affirm the judgment of the district court.

1

The Honorable Susan Webber Wright, United States District Judge for the Eastern District of Arkansas

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
104 F.3d 363, 1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 37692, 1996 WL 721134, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/brasfield-v-state-of-ark-ca8-1996.