Braselton v. Robinson

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Braselton v. Robinson

305 S.E.2d 591, 166 Ga. App. 889, 1983 Ga. App. LEXIS 2364

CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia

DecidedApril 18, 1983

Docket65955

StatusPublished

This text of 305 S.E.2d 591 (Braselton v. Robinson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Braselton v. Robinson, 305 S.E.2d 591, 166 Ga. App. 889, 1983 Ga. App. LEXIS 2364 (Ga. Ct. App. 1983).

Pincite

Opinions

Deen, Presiding Judge.

The sole issue in this appeal from the grant of summary judgment is whether one Thomas Pickett acted as agent for appellants when he assumed a debt to the Federal Land Bank. We find that the record contains a notarized document signed by appellants which sets forth Pickett’s agency as to the property in question and is dated August 7, 1975. Pickett took title to the property in June 1974, and the deed contains the assumption of the debt to the Federal Land Bank. The agency agreement states that it is the reduction into writing of the prior existing oral agreement between Pickett and the appellants and that Pickett took title to the property in his own name individually as agent for the appellants. The trial court did not err in granting summary judgment in favor of appellee.

Judgment affirmed.

Banke, J., concurs. Carley, J., concurs specially.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Deen, Presiding Judge.

The sole issue in this appeal from the grant of summary judgment is whether one Thomas Pickett acted as agent for appellants when he assumed a debt to the Federal Land Bank. We find that the record contains a notarized document signed by appellants which sets forth Pickett’s agency as to the property in question and is dated August 7, 1975. Pickett took title to the property in June 1974, and the deed contains the assumption of the debt to the Federal Land Bank. The agency agreement states that it is the reduction into writing of the prior existing oral agreement between Pickett and the appellants and that Pickett took title to the property in his own name individually as agent for the appellants. The trial court did not err in granting summary judgment in favor of appellee.

Judgment affirmed.

Banke, J., concurs. Carley, J., concurs specially.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

305 S.E.2d 591, 166 Ga. App. 889, 1983 Ga. App. LEXIS 2364, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/braselton-v-robinson-gactapp-1983.

Opinions

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack