Brasco Manufacturing Co. v. United States

U.S. Customs Court

Brasco Manufacturing Co. v. United States

37 Cust. Ct. 275

United States Customs Court·Decided June 28, 1956·No. No. 60074; protests 220622-K/5063 and 229042-K/5266 (Chicago)·Published

Opinion

Opinion by

Lawrence, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the) merchandise consists of hot-rolled steel strips similar to those involved in Abstract 58580, the claim of the plaintiff was sustained as to entries 14724 and 14912 covered by protest 220622-K. Since protest 229042-H was filed more than 61 days after liquidation, it was dismissed as untimely, by virtue of section 514 (16 U. S. C. § 1514).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Opinion by

Lawrence, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the) merchandise consists of hot-rolled steel strips similar to those involved in Abstract 58580, the claim of the plaintiff was sustained as to entries 14724 and 14912 covered by protest 220622-K. Since protest 229042-H was filed more than 61 days after liquidation, it was dismissed as untimely, by virtue of section 514 (16 U. S. C. § 1514).

Brasco Manufacturing Co. v. United States, 37 Cust. Ct. 275 (cusc 1956).

Pincite

37 Cust. Ct. 275 (Brasco Manufacturing Co. v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related