Brantley v. State

113 S.E. 45, 29 Ga. App. 52, 1922 Ga. App. LEXIS 49
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Brantley v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 28 Ga. App. 536
Court of Appeals of Georgia·Decided July 25, 1922·No. 13726·Published

Opinion

Luke, J.

1. The defendant was indicted for murder and convicted of voluntary manslaughter.. The evidence amply authorized, if indeed it did not demand, the conviction. -

2. The charge of the court, when read in its entirety, is not subject to the criticisms urged as to the several excerpts. The error assigned upon the judge’s failure to charge the law of circumstantial evidence is wholly without merit.

3. The defendant has had a legal trial. It was not error to overrule the motion for a new trial.

Judgment affirmed.

Broyles, G. J., and Bloodworth, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Brantley v. State, 113 S.E. 45, 29 Ga. App. 52, 1922 Ga. App. LEXIS 49 (Ga. Ct. App. 1922).

113 S.E. 45 (Brantley v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.