Brantley v. State
907 So. 2d 688, 2005 Fla. App. LEXIS 11842, 2005 WL 1788883
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Brantley v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 912 So. 2d 342 →
Opinion
The appellant challenges the denial of a motion to suppress, after which he entered a nolo plea. Because the plea was entered without reserving any issue for appeal, the ruling which the appellant challenges is not reviewable under Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.140(b)(2). The appellant’s convictions are therefore affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Brantley v. State, 907 So. 2d 688, 2005 Fla. App. LEXIS 11842, 2005 WL 1788883 (Fla. Ct. App. 2005).
907 So. 2d 688 (Brantley v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.