Brantley v. State
708 So. 2d 598, 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 3933, 1997 WL 180235
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Brantley v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 723 So. 2d 909 →
Opinion
Because the asserted errors in the appellant’s guidelines scoresheet and sentence are not readily ascertainable from the face of the record and are therefore not cognizable in this Rule 3.800(a) proceeding,1 State v. Montague, 682 So.2d 1085 (Fla.1996); McCalister v. State, 682 So.2d 556 (Fla.1996), approving McCalister v. State, 664 So.2d 1149 (Fla. 3d DCA 1995); State v. Callaway, 658 So.2d 983 (Fla.1995); Holland v. State, 672 So.2d 566 (Fla. 5th DCA 1996), review denied, 678 So.2d 338 (Fla.1996), the order below denying relief is
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Brantley v. State, 708 So. 2d 598, 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 3933, 1997 WL 180235 (Fla. Ct. App. 1997).
708 So. 2d 598 (Brantley v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
State v. Callaway
658 So. 2d 983 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1995)
McCalister v. State
664 So. 2d 1149 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1995)
State v. Montague
682 So. 2d 1085 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1996)
Holland v. State
672 So. 2d 566 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1996)