Brantley v. . Ricks

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Brantley v. . Ricks

124 S.E. 925, 188 N.C. 815, 1924 N.C. LEXIS 189

DecidedSeptember 17, 1924

StatusPublished

This text of 124 S.E. 925 (Brantley v. . Ricks) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Brantley v. . Ricks, 124 S.E. 925, 188 N.C. 815, 1924 N.C. LEXIS 189 (N.C. 1924).

Pincite

Opinion

Pee CueiaM.

On a controverted issue of fact, tbe jury has taken the defendant’s version of the matter. A careful perusal of the record leaves us with the impression that the case has been tried substantially in agreement with the law bearing on the subject, and we have discovered no ruling or action on the part of the trial court, as presented by the exceptions, which we apprehend should be held for reversible error. The verdict and judgment will be upheld.

No error.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Pee CueiaM.

On a controverted issue of fact, tbe jury has taken the defendant’s version of the matter. A careful perusal of the record leaves us with the impression that the case has been tried substantially in agreement with the law bearing on the subject, and we have discovered no ruling or action on the part of the trial court, as presented by the exceptions, which we apprehend should be held for reversible error. The verdict and judgment will be upheld.

No error.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

124 S.E. 925, 188 N.C. 815, 1924 N.C. LEXIS 189, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/brantley-v-ricks-nc-1924.