Brantley v. Hicks

Supreme Court of Georgia

Brantley v. Hicks

171 S.E. 451, 177 Ga. 812, 1933 Ga. LEXIS 433

CourtSupreme Court of Georgia

DecidedOctober 13, 1933

DocketNo. 9789

StatusPublished

Cited by4 cases

This text of 171 S.E. 451 (Brantley v. Hicks) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Brantley v. Hicks, 171 S.E. 451, 177 Ga. 812, 1933 Ga. LEXIS 433 (Ga. 1933).

Pincite

Opinion

Hill, J.

1. Levy of a tax execution against property in the hands of an administrator for distribution, which execution according to the evidence is excessive, is void, and a sale thereunder will pass no title.

2. Under the facts of this case the court did not err in continuing in force the order restraining a sale of the property levied on. Civil Code, § 4000. This case differs in its facts from Harris Orchard Co. v. Tharpe, 177 Ga. 547, where the complainant was a third party whose remedy is provided in the Civil Code (1910), § 1159.

Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices conaw. G. G. Bidgood, for plaintiff in error. L. fj. Porter and B. G. Hichs, contra.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI