Brantley v. Ethicon, Inc.

668 F. App'x 441
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided August 24, 2016·No. No. 16-1192, No. 16-1194·Published

Opinion

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Rhonda T. Brantley and Shelia L. Bra-cato appeal the district court’s orders dismissing these actions for failure to timely effect service of process. We have reviewed the records and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Brantley v. Ethicon, Inc., Nos. 2:12-cv-02605, 2:12-[442] md-02327, 2016 WL 305064 (S.D. W. Va. Jan. 25, 2016); Bracato v. Ethicon, Inc., Nos. 2:12-cv-02697, 2:12-md-02327, 2016 WL 312366 (S.D. W. Va. Jan. 25, 2016). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Brantley v. Ethicon, Inc., 668 F. App'x 441 (4th Cir. 2016).

668 F. App'x 441 (Brantley v. Ethicon, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.