Brantley v. Ethicon, Inc.
Opinion
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Rhonda T. Brantley and Shelia L. Bra-cato appeal the district court’s orders dismissing these actions for failure to timely effect service of process. We have reviewed the records and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Brantley v. Ethicon, Inc., Nos. 2:12-cv-02605, 2:12-[442] md-02327, 2016 WL 305064 (S.D. W. Va. Jan. 25, 2016); Bracato v. Ethicon, Inc., Nos. 2:12-cv-02697, 2:12-md-02327, 2016 WL 312366 (S.D. W. Va. Jan. 25, 2016). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
668 F. App'x 441 (Brantley v. Ethicon, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.