Brant v. Third Avenue Railroad
This text of 126 A.D. 941 (Brant v. Third Avenue Railroad) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
We think there should be a new trial in this case on the ground that the question as to the defendant’s negligence and the plaintiff’s freedom from contributory negligence should have been presented to the jury. The [942]*942judgment should be reversed and new trial ordered, with costs to appellant to abide event. Present—-Ingraham, McLaughlin, Clarke, Houghton and Scott, JJ. Judgment reversed, new trial ordered, costs to appellant to abide event.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
126 A.D. 941, 111 N.Y.S. 1110, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/brant-v-third-avenue-railroad-nyappdiv-1908.