Brant v. Third Avenue Railroad

126 A.D. 941, 111 N.Y.S. 1110

This text of 126 A.D. 941 (Brant v. Third Avenue Railroad) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Brant v. Third Avenue Railroad, 126 A.D. 941, 111 N.Y.S. 1110 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1908).

Opinion

Per Curiam :

We think there should be a new trial in this case on the ground that the question as to the defendant’s negligence and the plaintiff’s freedom from contributory negligence should have been presented to the jury. The [942]*942judgment should be reversed and new trial ordered, with costs to appellant to abide event. Present—-Ingraham, McLaughlin, Clarke, Houghton and Scott, JJ. Judgment reversed, new trial ordered, costs to appellant to abide event.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
126 A.D. 941, 111 N.Y.S. 1110, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/brant-v-third-avenue-railroad-nyappdiv-1908.