Brant v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Brant v. State

566 S.W.3d 670

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided February 5, 2019·No. WD 81096; Consolidated with WD 81097; WD 81098·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Doyle Brant appeals the judgment of the motion court, following an evidentiary hearing, denying his Rule 24.035 motions to set aside his convictions for two counts of second-degree statutory sodomy, three counts of second-degree statutory rape, and conspiracy to commit murder. He claims that he was denied effective assistance of counsel when plea counsel repeatedly advised him that if he pleaded guilty to all of the charges, he would be sentenced to three and a half years at the most. Because a published opinion would have no precedential value, a memorandum has been provided to the parties. The judgment is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

Doyle Brant appeals the judgment of the motion court, following an evidentiary hearing, denying his Rule 24.035 motions to set aside his convictions for two counts of second-degree statutory sodomy, three counts of second-degree statutory rape, and conspiracy to commit murder. He claims that he was denied effective assistance of counsel when plea counsel repeatedly advised him that if he pleaded guilty to all of the charges, he would be sentenced to three and a half years at the most. Because a published opinion would have no precedential value, a memorandum has been provided to the parties. The judgment is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).

Brant v. State, 566 S.W.3d 670 (Mo. Ct. App. 2019).

Pincite

566 S.W.3d 670 (Brant v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.