Brant v. State
817 So. 2d 1039, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 7713, 2002 WL 1174247
Opinion
We affirm the denial of appellant Richard L. Brant’s motion for post-conviction relief as to grounds 4 and 5. Denial of defense motions for acquittal, on the charges of possession with intent to sell and for aggravated assault on law enforcement, are not cognizable under Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850. See, e.g. Johnson v. State, 649 So.2d 948 (Fla. 3d DCA 1995)(issue which can be brought on direct appeal not cognizable by motion for post conviction relief).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Brant v. State, 817 So. 2d 1039, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 7713, 2002 WL 1174247 (Fla. Ct. App. 2002).
817 So. 2d 1039 (Brant v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Johnson v. State of Florida
649 So. 2d 948 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1995)