Brant v. Sieger

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Brant v. Sieger

132 A.D. 896, 116 N.Y.S. 1131

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedApril 15, 1909

StatusPublished

This text of 132 A.D. 896 (Brant v. Sieger) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Brant v. Sieger, 132 A.D. 896, 116 N.Y.S. 1131 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1909).

Pincite

Opinion

Motion granted, without costs, so as to amend the second notice of appeal by striking out as surplusage that part which appeals from the judgment, and by striking out the words thereof “ denying plaintiff’s motion to vacate said judgment and for a new trial in this action,” and inserting instead thereof “.denying the plaintiff’s motion to vacate said judgment upon the.exceptions taken on the trial, as contrary to the evidence or contrary-to.the law, or in the alternative, modifying said judgment.” Present — Woodward, Jenks, Gaynor, Burr and Miller, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Motion granted, without costs, so as to amend the second notice of appeal by striking out as surplusage that part which appeals from the judgment, and by striking out the words thereof “ denying plaintiff’s motion to vacate said judgment and for a new trial in this action,” and inserting instead thereof “.denying the plaintiff’s motion to vacate said judgment upon the.exceptions taken on the trial, as contrary to the evidence or contrary-to.the law, or in the alternative, modifying said judgment.” Present — Woodward, Jenks, Gaynor, Burr and Miller, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

132 A.D. 896, 116 N.Y.S. 1131, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/brant-v-sieger-nyappdiv-1909.