Brant v. Pasco Police

• Court: District Court, E.D. Washington
• Decided: May 14, 2020
• Docket: 4:20-cv-05034
• Status: Unknown

Opinion

1 2

3 4 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON 6

7 BRENT J. BRANT, NO: 4:20-CV-5034-TOR 8 Plaintiff, ORDER OF DISMISSAL 9 v. WITHOUT PREJUDICE

10 PASCO POLICE; JASON MILLER, FRANKLIN COUNTY SUPERIOR 11 COURT; SHAWN SANT; LOURDES MENTAL HEALTH; OFFICE OF 12 PUBLIC DEFENSE; FRANKLIN COUNTY SHERIFF’S OFFICE; CITY 13 OF PASCO; and FRANKLIN COUNTY PROSECUTING ATTORNEY, 14 Defendants. 15 BEFORE THE COURT is the Report and Recommendation (ECF No. 5). 16 This matter was submitted for consideration without oral argument. Having 17 reviewed the file and the records contained therein, the Court is fully informed. 18 On February 24, 2020, Plaintiff Brent J. Brant filed an Application to 19 Proceed in District Court without Prepaying Fees or Costs. ECF No. 2 (sealed). A 20 Magistrate Judge denied the application because it did not contain all the required information. ECF No. 3. The Magistrate Judge ordered Plaintiff to proffer the full 2|| filing fee or submit a properly completed Application to Proceed in forma 3|| pauperis, within 30 days of the order, ECF No. 3, which was extended to April 20, 2020 by subsequent Order, ECF No. 4. Plaintiff did not comply. The Magistrate Judge then recommended the case be dismissed without prejudice and allowed 6|| Plaintiff another 14-days to object. ECF No. 5. Fourteen days have expired and Plaintiff has not objected or complied with the filing fee requirement. 8 Payment of a filing fee is required to institute a suit in the United States 9|| District Courts, 28 U.S.C. § 1914, while the in forma pauperis statute allows the courts to waive the filing fee for indigent persons, 28 U.S.C. § 1915. Failure to comply with either provision for instituting a suit warrants dismissal of the action. 12|| See Rodriguez v. Cook, 169 F.3d 1176 (9th Cir. 1999) (appeal dismissed for failure to pay the filing fee or be eligible for in forma pauperis status). ACCORDINGLY, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED: 15 This action is DISMISSED without prejudice 16 The District Court Executive is hereby directed to enter this Order and Judgment accordingly, furnish copies to Plaintiff at his last known address, and 18|| CLOSE the file. DATED May 14, 2020. Ory — ous Os 20 & a K&S “THOMAS O. RICE “mms” Chief United States District Judge