Brant v. Fowler

2 Wend. 284
CourtNew York Supreme Court
DecidedMay 15, 1829
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 2 Wend. 284 (Brant v. Fowler) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Brant v. Fowler, 2 Wend. 284 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1829).

Opinion

By the Court, Sutherland, J.

The defendant is end-tied to his rule, unless the plaintiff stipulates to try at the nex* circuif> and pays the costs. The proper course, where there are several causes at issue in which the question is the same, and which depend upon the same evidence, is to apply to the court for a rule that one of the causes be tried, and that the others abide the event. By doing so, the plaintiff will prevent applications for judgment as in case of non-suit in the causes not tried. The plaintiff here having omitted to stipulate that this cause should abide the event of that tried, the defendant must have judgment as in case of non-suit, unless the plaintiff now stipulate that this cause shall abide the event of the cause which has been tried.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Jackson ex dem. Rogers v. Leggett
5 Wend. 83 (New York Supreme Court, 1830)
Campbell v. Munger
1 Cai. Cas. 129 (New York Supreme Court, 1803)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
2 Wend. 284, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/brant-v-fowler-nysupct-1829.