Branson v. York
181 S.E.2d 778, 11 N.C. App. 589, 1971 N.C. App. LEXIS 1590
Opinion
The action of the trial judge in setting aside a verdict in his discretion is not subject to review on appeal in the absence of an abuse of discretion. Goldston v. Chambers, 272 N.C. 53, 157 S.E. 2d 676; City of Randleman v. Hudson, 2 N.C. App. 404, 163 S.E. 2d 77. The record in this case does not disclose an abuse of discretion by the trial judge; hence, the order setting aside the verdict in this case is not subject to review on appeal.
Appeal dismissed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Branson v. York, 181 S.E.2d 778, 11 N.C. App. 589, 1971 N.C. App. LEXIS 1590 (N.C. Ct. App. 1971).
181 S.E.2d 778 (Branson v. York) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Goldston v. Chambers
157 S.E.2d 676 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1967)
City of Randleman v. Hudson
163 S.E.2d 77 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 1968)