Branson v. York

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Branson v. York

181 S.E.2d 778, 11 N.C. App. 589, 1971 N.C. App. LEXIS 1590

CourtCourt of Appeals of North Carolina

DecidedJune 23, 1971

DocketNo. 7119SC194

StatusPublished

This text of 181 S.E.2d 778 (Branson v. York) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Branson v. York, 181 S.E.2d 778, 11 N.C. App. 589, 1971 N.C. App. LEXIS 1590 (N.C. Ct. App. 1971).

Pincite

Opinion

PARKER, Judge.

The action of the trial judge in setting aside a verdict in his discretion is not subject to review on appeal in the absence of an abuse of discretion. Goldston v. Chambers, 272 N.C. 53, 157 S.E. 2d 676; City of Randleman v. Hudson, 2 N.C. App. 404, 163 S.E. 2d 77. The record in this case does not disclose an abuse of discretion by the trial judge; hence, the order setting aside the verdict in this case is not subject to review on appeal.

Appeal dismissed.

Chief Judge Mallard and Judge Vaughn concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PARKER, Judge.

The action of the trial judge in setting aside a verdict in his discretion is not subject to review on appeal in the absence of an abuse of discretion. Goldston v. Chambers, 272 N.C. 53, 157 S.E. 2d 676; City of Randleman v. Hudson, 2 N.C. App. 404, 163 S.E. 2d 77. The record in this case does not disclose an abuse of discretion by the trial judge; hence, the order setting aside the verdict in this case is not subject to review on appeal.

Appeal dismissed.

Chief Judge Mallard and Judge Vaughn concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

181 S.E.2d 778, 11 N.C. App. 589, 1971 N.C. App. LEXIS 1590, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/branson-v-york-ncctapp-1971.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack