Branson v. Townsand

104 S.E. 17, 25 Ga. App. 647, 1920 Ga. App. LEXIS 130
CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedSeptember 17, 1920
Docket11307
StatusPublished

This text of 104 S.E. 17 (Branson v. Townsand) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Branson v. Townsand, 104 S.E. 17, 25 Ga. App. 647, 1920 Ga. App. LEXIS 130 (Ga. Ct. App. 1920).

Opinion

Jenkins, P. J.

Being unable to say, as a matter of law, that the trial judge abused his discretion in this, the first grant of a new trial, this court will not interfere. Civil Code (1910), § 6204; Holland v. Williams, 3 Ga. App. 636 (60 S. E. 331); Smith v. Maddox-Rucker Banking Co., 8 Ga. App. 288 (1) (68 S. E. 1092).

Judgment affirmed.

Stephens and Smith, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Holland v. Williams
60 S.E. 331 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1908)
Smith v. Maddox-Rucker Banking Co.
68 S.E. 1092 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1910)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
104 S.E. 17, 25 Ga. App. 647, 1920 Ga. App. LEXIS 130, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/branson-v-townsand-gactapp-1920.