Branson v. Townsand
104 S.E. 17, 25 Ga. App. 647, 1920 Ga. App. LEXIS 130
Opinion
Being unable to say, as a matter of law, that the trial judge abused his discretion in this, the first grant of a new trial, this court will not interfere. Civil Code (1910), § 6204; Holland v. Williams, 3 Ga. App. 636 (60 S. E. 331); Smith v. Maddox-Rucker Banking Co., 8 Ga. App. 288 (1) (68 S. E. 1092).
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Branson v. Townsand, 104 S.E. 17, 25 Ga. App. 647, 1920 Ga. App. LEXIS 130 (Ga. Ct. App. 1920).
104 S.E. 17 (Branson v. Townsand) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Holland v. Williams
60 S.E. 331 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1908)
Smith v. Maddox-Rucker Banking Co.
68 S.E. 1092 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1910)