Branson v. Boardman

New York Supreme Court

Branson v. Boardman

1 Cole. & Cai. Cas. 51

DecidedApril 15, 1796

StatusPublished

This text of 1 Cole. & Cai. Cas. 51 (Branson v. Boardman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Branson v. Boardman, 1 Cole. & Cai. Cas. 51 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1796).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The 9th rule of April term, 1796, provides that “ If either party shall in pleading, in 6C any degree, tender an issue to the country, and if “ the opposite party shall not demur to the pleading, '£ within tiventy days after service of a copy thereof, u the cause shall in each of these cases, be deemed to “ be at issuebut here was a demurrer filed within the twenty days, and the striking out the similiter from the replication which had been filed was not necessary. Let the verdict be set aside with costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

The 9th rule of April term, 1796, provides that “ If either party shall in pleading, in 6C any degree, tender an issue to the country, and if “ the opposite party shall not demur to the pleading, '£ within tiventy days after service of a copy thereof, u the cause shall in each of these cases, be deemed to “ be at issuebut here was a demurrer filed within the twenty days, and the striking out the similiter from the replication which had been filed was not necessary. Let the verdict be set aside with costs.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1 Cole. & Cai. Cas. 51, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/branson-v-boardman-nysupct-1796.