Branson E. Fink v. Robert J. Beck Attorney General of Virginia

Fourth Circuit

Branson E. Fink v. Robert J. Beck Attorney General of Virginia

21 F.3d 422, 1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 15904, 1994 WL 118314

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

DecidedApril 6, 1994

Docket93-7067

StatusPublished

This text of 21 F.3d 422 (Branson E. Fink v. Robert J. Beck Attorney General of Virginia) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Branson E. Fink v. Robert J. Beck Attorney General of Virginia, 21 F.3d 422, 1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 15904, 1994 WL 118314 (4th Cir. 1994).

Pincite

Opinion

21 F.3d 422
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.

Branson E. FINK, Petitioner Appellant,
v.
Robert J. BECK; Attorney General of Virginia, Respondents Appellees.

No. 93-7067.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted Jan. 19, 1994.
Decided April 6, 1994.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. Samuel G. Wilson, District Judge. (CA-93-55-R)

Branson E. Fink, appellant pro se.

Linwood Theodore Wells, Jr., Asst. Atty. Gen., Richmond, VA, for appellees.

Before PHILLIPS, MURNAGHAN, and WILKINS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

Appellant seeks to appeal the district court's order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. Sec. 2254 (1988) petition. Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of probable cause to appeal and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. Fink v. Beck, No. CA-93-55-R (W.D. Va. Sept. 24, 1993). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

21 F.3d 422
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.

Branson E. FINK, Petitioner Appellant,
v.
Robert J. BECK; Attorney General of Virginia, Respondents Appellees.

No. 93-7067.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted Jan. 19, 1994.
Decided April 6, 1994.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. Samuel G. Wilson, District Judge. (CA-93-55-R)

Branson E. Fink, appellant pro se.

Linwood Theodore Wells, Jr., Asst. Atty. Gen., Richmond, VA, for appellees.

Before PHILLIPS, MURNAGHAN, and WILKINS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

Appellant seeks to appeal the district court's order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. Sec. 2254 (1988) petition. Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of probable cause to appeal and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. Fink v. Beck, No. CA-93-55-R (W.D. Va. Sept. 24, 1993). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

21 F.3d 422, 1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 15904, 1994 WL 118314, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/branson-e-fink-v-robert-j-beck-attorney-general-of-ca4-1994.