Bransfield v. Grand Union Co.

24 A.D.2d 586, 261 N.Y.S.2d 1006, 1965 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3567
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedJuly 12, 1965
StatusPublished
Cited by4 cases

This text of 24 A.D.2d 586 (Bransfield v. Grand Union Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Bransfield v. Grand Union Co., 24 A.D.2d 586, 261 N.Y.S.2d 1006, 1965 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3567 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1965).

Opinion

In a negligence action to recover damages for personal injury sustained when plaintiff slipped and fell on a wet, sticky substance upon the floor of the defendant’s store, the defendant appeals from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County, entered October 21, 1964 after trial, upon a jury’s verdict in the plaintiff’s favor. Judgment affirmed, with costs. No opinion. Christ, Brennan, Hill and Rabin, JJ., concur; Ughetta, Acting P. J., dissents and votes to reverse the judgment and to dismiss the complaint, with the following memorandum: Plaintiff, a customer of defendant, slipped on egg drippings in the center aisle of defendant’s supermarket. A few minutes prior thereto, defendant’s employee had mopped the floor in the area of the accident. A few minutes after the accident, defendant’s manager said to another employee I thought I told you to clean that up ”, to which the employee answered “I did clean it.” The statement by the manager to the employee was inadmissible as proof of notice (Golden v. Horn & Hardart Co., 244 App. Div. 92, affd. 270 N. Y. 544; Cook v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co., 244 App. Div. 63, affd. 268 N. Y. 599). There is no other proof of actual or constructive notice to defendant of the egg drippings on the floor. [587]*587Without, proof of notice, there is no liability on the part of defendant (Dowling v. Woolworth Co., 16 A D 2d 672; Sikora v. Apex Beverage Corp., 282 App. Div. 193, affd. 306 N. Y. 917).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Navedo v. 250 Willis Avenue Supermarket
290 A.D.2d 246 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2002)
Tyrrell v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.
278 A.D.2d 770 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2000)
Williams v. Waldbaums Supermarkets, Inc.
236 A.D.2d 605 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1997)
Rhodeman v. City of New York
57 A.D.2d 765 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1977)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
24 A.D.2d 586, 261 N.Y.S.2d 1006, 1965 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3567, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bransfield-v-grand-union-co-nyappdiv-1965.