Brannvall v. Brannvall

187 Misc. 648, 62 N.Y.S.2d 765, 1946 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 2309
CourtCity of New York Municipal Court
DecidedMay 15, 1946
StatusPublished

This text of 187 Misc. 648 (Brannvall v. Brannvall) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering City of New York Municipal Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Brannvall v. Brannvall, 187 Misc. 648, 62 N.Y.S.2d 765, 1946 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 2309 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1946).

Opinion

Keller, J.

The order sued upon is merely an intermediate order in the New Jersey Chancery Court for the payment of alimony pendente lite. It is not a final decree, and calling it that does not make it one. There is less room for argument that this order is enforcible in the State of New York than there was in the case of Rossi v. Rossi (187 Misc. 543, affd. 269 App. Div. 821), in which case the provision for alimony upon which the [649]*649action was predicated was incorporated in a final decree of divorce.

The motion is granted. The amended complaint is dismissed. Judgment may be entered accordingly in favor of defendant. Execution of judgment for costs is stayed for ten days after service upon the attorney for plaintiff of a copy of this order with notice of entry.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Rossi v. Rossi
269 A.D. 821 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1945)
Rossi v. Rossi
187 Misc. 543 (New York Supreme Court, 1944)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
187 Misc. 648, 62 N.Y.S.2d 765, 1946 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 2309, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/brannvall-v-brannvall-nynyccityct-1946.