Brannon v. State

115 S.E. 281, 29 Ga. App. 311, 1922 Ga. App. LEXIS 267
CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedDecember 13, 1922
Docket13979
StatusPublished

This text of 115 S.E. 281 (Brannon v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Brannon v. State, 115 S.E. 281, 29 Ga. App. 311, 1922 Ga. App. LEXIS 267 (Ga. Ct. App. 1922).

Opinion

Broyles, C. J.

Under all the particular facts of the case, the court erred in excluding evidence, on the grounds stated, as complained of in grounds 1 and 4 (inclusive) of the amendment to the motion for a new trial. The case was a very close one upon the facts, and the rejected evidence, added to the evidence admitted, might have caused the jury to acquit the defendant. Another trial of the ease therefore is required. In view of this ruling it is unnecessary to consider the grounds of the motion for a new trial based upon alleged newly discovered evidence. .

Jtidgment reversed.

Luke and Bloodworth, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
115 S.E. 281, 29 Ga. App. 311, 1922 Ga. App. LEXIS 267, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/brannon-v-state-gactapp-1922.