Brannon v. State

874 So. 2d 691, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 7346, 2004 WL 1161804
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided May 26, 2004·No. No. 4D03-1770·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The judgment and sentence entered pursuant to the trial court’s order revoking appellant’s probation is affirmed. The written order revoking appellant’s probation, however, does not conform to the oral finding that appellant was in violation of paragraph VI of the affidavit of violation of probation. Therefore, we remand with instructions to enter an amended revocation order correcting this clerical error. See Rodriguez v. State, 777 So.2d 1175 (Fla. 4th DCA 2001).

WARNER, KLEIN and HAZOURI, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Brannon v. State, 874 So. 2d 691, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 7346, 2004 WL 1161804 (Fla. Ct. App. 2004).

874 So. 2d 691 (Brannon v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Vanstraten v. State
901 So. 2d 391 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2005)