Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Brannon v. State

Brannon v. State

792 So. 2d 498, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 3421, 2001 WL 261656
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Brannon v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 9482 →
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided March 19, 2001·No. No. 1D99-4243·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Appellant has raised an unpreserved sentencing error. We affirm and do not reach the merits because this appeal falls outside the window period provided for in Maddox v. State, 760 So.2d 89 (Fla.2000). See Harvey v. State, 786 So.2d 595 (Fla. 1st DCA 2001); Reese v. State, 763 So.2d 537 (Fla. 4th DCA 2000).

BARFIELD, C.J., WEBSTER and VAN NORTWICK, JJ„ concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Brannon v. State, 792 So. 2d 498, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 3421, 2001 WL 261656 (Fla. Ct. App. 2001).

792 So. 2d 498 (Brannon v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Reese v. State
763 So. 2d 537 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2000)
Harvey v. State
786 So. 2d 595 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2001)