Brannon v. Simpson

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Brannon v. Simpson

386 S.E.2d 687, 192 Ga. App. 894, 1989 Ga. App. LEXIS 1230

CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia

DecidedSeptember 5, 1989

DocketA89A1559

StatusPublished

This text of 386 S.E.2d 687 (Brannon v. Simpson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Brannon v. Simpson, 386 S.E.2d 687, 192 Ga. App. 894, 1989 Ga. App. LEXIS 1230 (Ga. Ct. App. 1989).

Pincite

Opinion

Deen, Presiding Judge.

Louise Brannon brought a tort action against her father, Mayes, and co-executors of her grandfather’s estate (her uncle, J. W. Simpson, Jr., and her husband as her mother’s representative), alleging breach of fiduciary duty as to her remainder interest in certain real property. Brannon’s mother died in 1972, and Simpson and Mayes (who had managed the properties for the estate) showed her the properties in which she owned a one-half interest. A dispute arose between the parties over her interest in these and other properties which she believed had originally been a part of the estate. Simpson filed a partitioning action, and Brannon later attempted to file a counterclaim against Simpson individually and in his representative capacity alleging breach of fiduciary duty. The Bartow County Superior Court refused to allow the counterclaim to be filed by amendment, relying upon Rule 13 (f) of the Civil Practice Act (currently OCGA § 9-11-13 (f)), and held that Brannon and her attorney knew of the existence of the counterclaim at the time that the answer was filed, but failed to file it, and that this failure was not due to oversight, inadvertence or excusable neglect. This ruling and the rulings upon other orders in the case were appealed. Three of the thirty-three enumerations of error pertained to the dismissal of the counterclaim. In Brannon v. Simpson, 238 Ga. 351 (232 SE2d 841) (1977), the court affirmed all the rulings of the trial court in a two-sentence opinion.

In the instant case, the trial court held that Brannon’s claim is barred by the doctrine of res judicata and dismissed the case. Held:

We fully agree with the decision of the court below. We have examined the record submitted to the Supreme Court in Brannon v. Simpson, supra, and find the issue to be controlled by the doctrine of res judicata. Simpson’s executrix has the requisite privity of estate to assert this defense. College Park Land Co. v. Mayor of College Park, 48 Ga. App. 528 (173 SE 239) (1934).

Judgment affirmed.

Birdsong and Benham, JJ., concur. W. Morgan Akin, R. Lamar Brannon, for appellee.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Deen, Presiding Judge.

Louise Brannon brought a tort action against her father, Mayes, and co-executors of her grandfather’s estate (her uncle, J. W. Simpson, Jr., and her husband as her mother’s representative), alleging breach of fiduciary duty as to her remainder interest in certain real property. Brannon’s mother died in 1972, and Simpson and Mayes (who had managed the properties for the estate) showed her the properties in which she owned a one-half interest. A dispute arose between the parties over her interest in these and other properties which she believed had originally been a part of the estate. Simpson filed a partitioning action, and Brannon later attempted to file a counterclaim against Simpson individually and in his representative capacity alleging breach of fiduciary duty. The Bartow County Superior Court refused to allow the counterclaim to be filed by amendment, relying upon Rule 13 (f) of the Civil Practice Act (currently OCGA § 9-11-13 (f)), and held that Brannon and her attorney knew of the existence of the counterclaim at the time that the answer was filed, but failed to file it, and that this failure was not due to oversight, inadvertence or excusable neglect. This ruling and the rulings upon other orders in the case were appealed. Three of the thirty-three enumerations of error pertained to the dismissal of the counterclaim. In Brannon v. Simpson, 238 Ga. 351 (232 SE2d 841) (1977), the court affirmed all the rulings of the trial court in a two-sentence opinion.

In the instant case, the trial court held that Brannon’s claim is barred by the doctrine of res judicata and dismissed the case. Held:

We fully agree with the decision of the court below. We have examined the record submitted to the Supreme Court in Brannon v. Simpson, supra, and find the issue to be controlled by the doctrine of res judicata. Simpson’s executrix has the requisite privity of estate to assert this defense. College Park Land Co. v. Mayor of College Park, 48 Ga. App. 528 (173 SE 239) (1934).

Judgment affirmed.

Birdsong and Benham, JJ., concur. W. Morgan Akin, R. Lamar Brannon, for appellee.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

386 S.E.2d 687, 192 Ga. App. 894, 1989 Ga. App. LEXIS 1230, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/brannon-v-simpson-gactapp-1989.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack