Brannigan v. Terzakis
131 N.E.2d 295, 309 N.Y. 892
This text of 131 N.E.2d 295 (Brannigan v. Terzakis) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Brannigan v. Terzakis, 131 N.E.2d 295, 309 N.Y. 892 (N.Y. 1955).
Opinion
In the Matter of the Claim of James E. Brannigan, Respondent,
v.
Peter Terzakis, Doing Business as Metropolitan Painting and Decorating Co., et al., Appellants. Workmen's Compensation Board, Respondent.
Court of Appeals of the State of New York.
Paul F. Donohue for appellants.
Jacob K. Javits, Attorney-General (Gilbert M. Landy, James O. Moore, Jr., and Roy Wiedersum of counsel), for Workmen's Compensation Board, respondent.
Concur: CONWAY, Ch. J., DESMOND, FULD, FROESSEL, VAN VOORHIS and BURKE, JJ. Taking no part: DYE, J.
Order affirmed, with costs; no opinion.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Claim of Brannigan v. Terzakis
131 N.E.2d 295 (New York Court of Appeals, 1955)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
131 N.E.2d 295, 309 N.Y. 892, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/brannigan-v-terzakis-ny-1955.