Home/New York Court of Appeals/Brannigan v. Terzakis

Brannigan v. Terzakis

131 N.E.2d 295, 309 N.Y. 892
New York Court of Appeals·Decided November 23, 1955·Published

Opinion

309 N.Y. 892 (1955)

In the Matter of the Claim of James E. Brannigan, Respondent,
v.
Peter Terzakis, Doing Business as Metropolitan Painting and Decorating Co., et al., Appellants. Workmen's Compensation Board, Respondent.

Court of Appeals of the State of New York.

Argued October 13, 1955.
Decided November 23, 1955

Paul F. Donohue for appellants.

Jacob K. Javits, Attorney-General (Gilbert M. Landy, James O. Moore, Jr., and Roy Wiedersum of counsel), for Workmen's Compensation Board, respondent.

Concur: CONWAY, Ch. J., DESMOND, FULD, FROESSEL, VAN VOORHIS and BURKE, JJ. Taking no part: DYE, J.

Order affirmed, with costs; no opinion.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Brannigan v. Terzakis, 131 N.E.2d 295, 309 N.Y. 892 (N.Y. 1955).

131 N.E.2d 295 (Brannigan v. Terzakis) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Claim of Brannigan v. Terzakis
131 N.E.2d 295 (New York Court of Appeals, 1955)