Brannan v. State
This text of 175 S.W. 697 (Brannan v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Appellant was convicted of forgery and his punishment assessed at two years confinement in the State penitentiary.
The record is before us without a motion for a new trial, any bill of exceptions or a statement of facts. A notice of appeal is vaguely referred to in the sentence pronounced, but no notice other than this appears in the record. In the ease of Young v. State, 41 Texas Crim. Rep., 247, it is held that such indefinite notice is insufficient to confer jurisdiction on this court. However, in the case of Lewis v. State, 39 S. W. Rep., 370, it is held that the sentence being a part of the minutes of the court, and it bearing evidence that notice of appeal was given in open court, would confer jurisdiction on this court, and we are of the opinion that this latter opinion is more in consonance with the articles regulating an appeal. In the condition the record is, all we can do is to look to the sufficiency of the indictment, and it being valid the judgment must be affirmed.
The judgment is affirmed.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
175 S.W. 697, 76 Tex. Crim. 492, 1915 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 425, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/brannan-v-state-texcrimapp-1915.