Home/Supreme Court/BRANIGIN Et Al. v. DUDDLESTON Et Al.

BRANIGIN Et Al. v. DUDDLESTON Et Al.

391 U.S. 364, 88 S. Ct. 1666, 20 L. Ed. 2d 641, 1968 U.S. LEXIS 1646
CourtSupreme Court of the United States
DecidedOctober 14, 1968
Docket1252
StatusPublished
Cited by6 cases

This text of 391 U.S. 364 (BRANIGIN Et Al. v. DUDDLESTON Et Al.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
BRANIGIN Et Al. v. DUDDLESTON Et Al., 391 U.S. 364, 88 S. Ct. 1666, 20 L. Ed. 2d 641, 1968 U.S. LEXIS 1646 (1968).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The motions to affirm are granted and the judgment is affirmed.

Mr. Justice Harlan, for reasons contained in his memorandum of March 4, 1968 (390 U. S. 932, sub nom. Branigin v. Grills), in which he acquiesced in the denial of stays of enforcement of the District Court’s judgment, also acquiesces in the Court’s affirmance of that judgment.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Smith v. Clark
189 F. Supp. 2d 548 (S.D. Mississippi, 2002)
Mallory v. State of Ohio
38 F. Supp. 2d 525 (S.D. Ohio, 1997)
Brady v. New Jersey Redistricting Commission
622 A.2d 843 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1992)
Skolnick v. Board Of Commissioners Of Cook County
435 F.2d 361 (Seventh Circuit, 1970)
Skolnick v. Board of Commissioners
435 F.2d 361 (Seventh Circuit, 1970)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
391 U.S. 364, 88 S. Ct. 1666, 20 L. Ed. 2d 641, 1968 U.S. LEXIS 1646, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/branigin-et-al-v-duddleston-et-al-scotus-1968.