BRANIGIN Et Al. v. DUDDLESTON Et Al.

391 U.S. 364, 88 S. Ct. 1666, 20 L. Ed. 2d 641, 1968 U.S. LEXIS 1646

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The motions to affirm are granted and the judgment is affirmed.

Mr. Justice Harlan, for reasons contained in his memorandum of March 4, 1968 (390 U. S. 932, sub nom. Branigin v. Grills), in which he acquiesced in the denial of stays of enforcement of the District Court’s judgment, also acquiesces in the Court’s affirmance of that judgment.