Braniff Airways, Inc. v. United States

Fifth Circuit

Braniff Airways, Inc. v. United States

315 F.2d 631

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

DecidedApril 19, 1963

Docket19490

StatusPublished

This text of 315 F.2d 631 (Braniff Airways, Inc. v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Braniff Airways, Inc. v. United States, 315 F.2d 631 (5th Cir. 1963).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The judgment before us on this appeal denied recovery to the appellant, Braniff Airways, Inc., in an action against the United States brought under the Federal Tort Claims Act, 28 U.S.C.A. §§ 1346(b), 2671 et seq. The district court has set forth the claim of the appellant with its findings and conclusions. Braniff Airways, Inc. v. United States, D.C., 203 F.Supp. 602. The district court reached the conclusion, among others, that “There was no causal connection between any alleged act or omission to act on the part of the defendant [United States] and the resultant accident and injuries.” 203 F.Supp. 602, 607. The record fully supports this conclusion. This being so, it is not necessary to consider the other questions raised by the appellant. The judgment of the district court is

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The judgment before us on this appeal denied recovery to the appellant, Braniff Airways, Inc., in an action against the United States brought under the Federal Tort Claims Act, 28 U.S.C.A. §§ 1346(b), 2671 et seq. The district court has set forth the claim of the appellant with its findings and conclusions. Braniff Airways, Inc. v. United States, D.C., 203 F.Supp. 602. The district court reached the conclusion, among others, that “There was no causal connection between any alleged act or omission to act on the part of the defendant [United States] and the resultant accident and injuries.” 203 F.Supp. 602, 607. The record fully supports this conclusion. This being so, it is not necessary to consider the other questions raised by the appellant. The judgment of the district court is

Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

315 F.2d 631, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/braniff-airways-inc-v-united-states-ca5-1963.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack