Branic International Realty Corp. v. Phillip Pitt

New York Court of Appeals·Decided November 18, 2014·No. 200·Published

Opinion

================================================================= This memorandum is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the New York Reports. ----------------------------------------------------------------- No. 200 Branic International Realty Corp., Appellant, v. Phillip Pitt, &c., Respondent, "John Doe," et al., Respondents.

Ronald J. Rosenberg, for appellant. Martha A. Weithman, for respondent Pitt. The Bronx Defenders, Inc. et al., amici curiae.

MEMORANDUM: The order of the Appellate Division should be reversed, without costs, the matter remitted to the Appellate Division with directions to dismiss the proceeding solely on the ground of mootness, and the certified question not answered as unnecessary. The issues presented in this case are moot because

- 1 - - 2 - No. 200

respondent voluntarily vacated the premises. The mootness exception is not applicable under the facts of this case (see e.g. Matter of Hearst Corp. v Clyne, 50 NY2d 707, 714-715 [1980]) and therefore the proceeding should be dismissed (see Matter of Park E. Corp. v Whalen, 43 NY2d 735, 736 [1977]). * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * Order reversed, without costs, matter remitted to the Appellate Division, First Department, with directions to dismiss the petition solely on the ground of mootness and certified question not answered as unnecessary, in a memorandum. Chief Judge Lippman and Judges Graffeo, Read, Smith, Pigott and Rivera concur. Judge Abdus-Salaam took no part.

Decided November 18, 2014

- 2 -

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Branic International Realty Corp. v. Phillip Pitt, (N.Y. 2014).

Branic International Realty Corp. v. Phillip Pitt (Branic International Realty Corp. v. Phillip Pitt) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Park East Corp. v. Whalen
372 N.E.2d 578 (New York Court of Appeals, 1977)
Hearst Corp. v. Clyne
409 N.E.2d 876 (New York Court of Appeals, 1980)