Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Branham v. State

Branham v. State

699 So. 2d 809, 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 10735, 1997 WL 590073
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedSeptember 25, 1997
DocketNo. 97-1519
StatusPublished

This text of 699 So. 2d 809 (Branham v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Branham v. State, 699 So. 2d 809, 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 10735, 1997 WL 590073 (Fla. Ct. App. 1997).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The appellant challenges an order by which his motion to correct an illegal sentence, pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(a), was denied. We affirm because appellant did not raise a claim cognizable under 3.800(a). King v. State, 681 So.2d 1136 (Fla.1996); Davis v. State, 661 So.2d 1193 (Fla.1995); State v. Callaway, 658 So.2d 983 (Fla.1995); Baldwin v. State, 679 So.2d 1193 (Fla. 1st DCA 1996).

MINER, ALLEN and PADOVANO, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State v. Callaway
658 So. 2d 983 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1995)
Davis v. State
661 So. 2d 1193 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1995)
Baldwin v. State
679 So. 2d 1193 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1996)
King v. State
681 So. 2d 1136 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1996)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
699 So. 2d 809, 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 10735, 1997 WL 590073, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/branham-v-state-fladistctapp-1997.