Branham v. State
699 So. 2d 809, 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 10735, 1997 WL 590073
Opinion
The appellant challenges an order by which his motion to correct an illegal sentence, pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(a), was denied. We affirm because appellant did not raise a claim cognizable under 3.800(a). King v. State, 681 So.2d 1136 (Fla.1996); Davis v. State, 661 So.2d 1193 (Fla.1995); State v. Callaway, 658 So.2d 983 (Fla.1995); Baldwin v. State, 679 So.2d 1193 (Fla. 1st DCA 1996).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Branham v. State, 699 So. 2d 809, 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 10735, 1997 WL 590073 (Fla. Ct. App. 1997).
699 So. 2d 809 (Branham v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
State v. Callaway
658 So. 2d 983 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1995)
Davis v. State
661 So. 2d 1193 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1995)
Baldwin v. State
679 So. 2d 1193 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1996)
King v. State
681 So. 2d 1136 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1996)