Branham v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Branham v. State

537 So. 2d 196, 14 Fla. L. Weekly 252, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 197, 1989 WL 3273

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedJanuary 20, 1989

DocketNo. 87-1298

StatusPublished

This text of 537 So. 2d 196 (Branham v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Branham v. State, 537 So. 2d 196, 14 Fla. L. Weekly 252, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 197, 1989 WL 3273 (Fla. Ct. App. 1989).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We agree with appellant that the trial court erred in imposing court costs without notice or the opportunity to be heard. Jenkins v. State, 444 So.2d 947 (Fla.1984). Accordingly, we strike the cost provision without prejudice to the state to seek reassessment after proper notice to appellant. The judgments and sentences are affirmed in all other respects.

RYDER, A.C.J., and FRANK and ALTENBERND, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

We agree with appellant that the trial court erred in imposing court costs without notice or the opportunity to be heard. Jenkins v. State, 444 So.2d 947 (Fla.1984). Accordingly, we strike the cost provision without prejudice to the state to seek reassessment after proper notice to appellant. The judgments and sentences are affirmed in all other respects.

RYDER, A.C.J., and FRANK and ALTENBERND, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

537 So. 2d 196, 14 Fla. L. Weekly 252, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 197, 1989 WL 3273, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/branham-v-state-fladistctapp-1989.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack