Branham v. Kentucky Bar Ass'n

390 S.W.3d 801, 2013 WL 683051, 2013 Ky. LEXIS 26
CourtKentucky Supreme Court
DecidedFebruary 21, 2013
DocketNo. 2013-SC-000027-KB
StatusPublished

This text of 390 S.W.3d 801 (Branham v. Kentucky Bar Ass'n) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Kentucky Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Branham v. Kentucky Bar Ass'n, 390 S.W.3d 801, 2013 WL 683051, 2013 Ky. LEXIS 26 (Ky. 2013).

Opinion

OPINION AND ORDER

Movant, Clifford Alan Branham, KBA Member No. 88852, applied for restoration to membership pursuant to SCR 3.500(1) on March 8, 2010.1 Branham’s bar roster address is 841 Corporate Drive, Suite 310, Lexington, Kentucky, 40503. Branham was admitted to the Kentucky Bar on October 19, 2001. By order of this Court entered December 28, 2009, he was suspended from the practice of law for failing to pay the late fee associated with the late payment of his 2009/2010 bar dues.

On March 19, 2010, the Board reviewed the Application for Restoration and voted 16-12 against a recommendation for restoration, and instead referred this matter to the Character and Fitness Committee pursuant to SCR 3.500(2)(d)3 to conduct such further proceedings authorized under SCR 2.0114 and SCR 2.040.5 The Board’s referral to the Character and Fitness Committee was entered by the Disciplinary Clerk on April 14, 2010. On April 22, 2010, the Character and Fitness Committee sent Branham a questionnaire which was to be returned within thirty days, along with the required application fee and bond for investigation costs pursuant to SCR 3.500(2) and (4). After the deadline passed without response, Branham informally communicated his intention to pursue restoration, and received informal extensions to do so through April 2011.

Branham has not communicated with the Board or the Character and Fitness Committee since December 9, 2010. The Character and Fitness Committee reviewed his Application for Reinstatement and found that it was incomplete, and that he failed to meet his burden of proof to establish his present qualifications to prac[802]*802tice law pursuant to SCR 3.500(5).6 Accordingly, on October 22, 2012, the Character and Fitness Committee unanimously recommended the disapproval of Bran-ham’s Application for Restoration.

On November 16, 2012, the Board of Governors considered the Application for Restoration and by a 20-1 vote (with one member absent) recommended that Bran-ham’s Application for Restoration be disapproved and that this Court enter an Order denying restoration. Upon review, this Court hereby adopts the decision and recommendations of the Board.

Thus, it is hereby ORDERED that:

1. Clifford Alan Branham’s Application for Restoration is denied.

2. Pursuant to SCR 3.500(4), Clifford Alan Branham is directed to pay the costs associated with this proceeding in the amount of $619.32, for which execution may issue from this Court upon finality of this Opinion and Order.

MINTON, C.J., ABRAMSON, CUNNINGHAM, NOBLE, SCOTT and VENTERS, JJ., sitting. All concur.

ENTERED: February 21, 2013.

/s/ John D. Minton, Jr.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
390 S.W.3d 801, 2013 WL 683051, 2013 Ky. LEXIS 26, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/branham-v-kentucky-bar-assn-ky-2013.