Brandyn Phillips v. State of Minnesota

588 F. App'x 516
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
DecidedJanuary 6, 2015
Docket14-2160
StatusUnpublished

This text of 588 F. App'x 516 (Brandyn Phillips v. State of Minnesota) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Brandyn Phillips v. State of Minnesota, 588 F. App'x 516 (8th Cir. 2015).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Brandyn Phillips appeals the district court’s 1 dismissal of his complaint asserting claims related to the revocation of his Minnesota driver’s license. Having carefully reviewed the record and the parties’ arguments on appeal, we conclude that the dismissal was proper. See Minch Family LLLP. v. Buffalo-Red River Watershed Dist., 628 F.3d 960, 965 (8th Cir.2010) (dismissal based on Rooker-Feldman doctrine is reviewed de novo); Minn. Majority v. Mansky, 708 F.3d 1051, 1055 (8th Cir.) (dismissal for failure to state claim is reviewed de novo), cert. denied, - U.S. -, 134 S.Ct. 824, - L.Ed.2d - (2013). Therefore, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

1

. The Honorable Donovan W. Frank, United States District Judge for the District of Minnesota, adopting the report and recommendations of the Honorable Jeffrey J. Keyes, United States Magistrate Judge for the District of Minnesota.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Minnesota Majority v. Joe Mansky
708 F.3d 1051 (Eighth Circuit, 2013)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
588 F. App'x 516, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/brandyn-phillips-v-state-of-minnesota-ca8-2015.