Brandy v. State

43 Fla. Supp. 2d 11
CourtCircuit Court for the Judicial Circuits of Florida
DecidedApril 4, 1990
DocketCase No. 89-11920 (County Court Case No. 89-5921)
StatusPublished

This text of 43 Fla. Supp. 2d 11 (Brandy v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Circuit Court for the Judicial Circuits of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Brandy v. State, 43 Fla. Supp. 2d 11 (Fla. Super. Ct. 1990).

Opinion

OPINION OF THE COURT

SUSAN C. BUCKLEW, Circuit Judge.

Appellant, Frank Vincent Brandy appeals the trial court’s ruling denying his motion for Judgment of Acquittal and finding him guilty. This court reverses.

Appellant was stopped because of a suspected violation of Florida [12]*12Statute 316.0895(1) which makes it illegal for a motor vehicle to follow another vehicle too closely. Appellant was then arrested for violation of Florida Statute 843.02, making it illegal to oppose a police officer in the lawful execution of a legal duty.

Appellant was riding a bicycle. Florida Statute 316.0895(1) makes it illegal for a “motor vehicle” to follow another vehicle too closely. “Motor vehicle” is defined in Florida Statute 316.003(21) as “any self-propelled vehicle. . .but not including any bicycle or moped.” It is correct as the Appellee argues that according to F.S. 316.2065(1) the rights and duties of a bicyclist are the same as the driver of any other “vehicle” under chapter 316. However, “vehicle” is defined differently than “motor vehicle”. F.S. 316.003(75) defines vehicle as “every device in, upon, or by which any person or property is or may be transported or drawn upon a highway. . .” Because F.S. 316.0895(1) specifically used the term “motor vehicle”, this court finds bicycles are not regulated under F.S. 316.0895(1).

Therefore the stop of the appellant was not lawful or valid and the subsequent obstruction which was without violence is not punishable.

The trial court’s verdict of guilty is reversed. The case is hereby remanded to the trial court with instructions to discharge the Appellant, Frank Brandy.

DONE and ORDERED this 4th day of April, 1990 in Hillsborough County, Florida.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
43 Fla. Supp. 2d 11, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/brandy-v-state-flacirct-1990.