Brandy Silman v. U. S. Bank, N.A.

Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided November 24, 2015·No. 01-15-00364-CV·Published

Opinion

Opinion issued November 24, 2015

In The

Court of Appeals

For The

First District of Texas

TEX. R. APP. P. 38.6(a), 38.8(a)(1). After being notified by the Clerk of this Court

on August 25, 2015, that her appeal was subject to dismissal for failure to timely

file her appellate brief, appellant failed to timely respond. See id. at 38.8(a)(1),

42.3(c).

Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution for failure to

timely file a brief. See TEX. R. APP. P. 38.8(a)(1), 42.3(b), (c). We dismiss any

pending motions as moot.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Justices Jennings, Keyes, and Bland.

the Third District of Texas to this Court pursuant to its docket equalization powers. See TEX. GOV’T CODE ANN. § 73.001 (West Supp. 2014) (“The supreme court may order cases transferred from one court of appeals to another at any time that, in the opinion of the supreme court, there is good cause for the transfer.”); Order Regarding Transfer of Cases From Courts of Appeals, Misc. Docket No. 15–9054, ¶ II (Tex. Mar. 24, 2015). We are unaware of any conflict between the precedent of the Third Court of Appeals and that of this Court on any relevant issue. See TEX. R. APP. P. 41.3.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Brandy Silman v. U. S. Bank, N.A., (Tex. Ct. App. 2015).

Brandy Silman v. U. S. Bank, N.A. (Brandy Silman v. U. S. Bank, N.A.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.