Brandy Silman v. U. S. Bank, N.A.
Opinion
Opinion issued November 24, 2015
In The
Court of Appeals
For The
First District of Texas
TEX. R. APP. P. 38.6(a), 38.8(a)(1). After being notified by the Clerk of this Court
on August 25, 2015, that her appeal was subject to dismissal for failure to timely
file her appellate brief, appellant failed to timely respond. See id. at 38.8(a)(1),
42.3(c).
Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution for failure to
timely file a brief. See TEX. R. APP. P. 38.8(a)(1), 42.3(b), (c). We dismiss any
pending motions as moot.
PER CURIAM
Panel consists of Justices Jennings, Keyes, and Bland.
the Third District of Texas to this Court pursuant to its docket equalization powers. See TEX. GOV’T CODE ANN. § 73.001 (West Supp. 2014) (“The supreme court may order cases transferred from one court of appeals to another at any time that, in the opinion of the supreme court, there is good cause for the transfer.”); Order Regarding Transfer of Cases From Courts of Appeals, Misc. Docket No. 15–9054, ¶ II (Tex. Mar. 24, 2015). We are unaware of any conflict between the precedent of the Third Court of Appeals and that of this Court on any relevant issue. See TEX. R. APP. P. 41.3.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Brandy Silman v. U. S. Bank, N.A. (Brandy Silman v. U. S. Bank, N.A.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.